2000 • Toyota
Vista
Toyota Vista 2.0 i 16V (145 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
2000 Toyota Vista vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 Turbo (147 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Vista
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota VistaSpecificationCitroen XM
ToyotaMakeCitroen
VistaModelXM
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Toyota VistaSpecificationCitroen XM
—0–100 km/h9,3 s
180 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
145 HPPower147 HP
196 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota VistaSpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
12 ltUrban consumption14,5 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota VistaSpecificationCitroen XM
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota VistaSpecificationCitroen XM
4670 mmLength4708 mm
1695 mmWidth1794 mm
1510 mmHeight1394 mm
1310 KgWeight1401 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Vista and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Vista leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…