DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 Mitsubishi Dion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Dion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMitsubishi
XMModelDion
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
147 HPPower135 HP
235 NmTorque183 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,5 ltUrban consumption13 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4460 mm
1794 mmWidth1695 mm
1394 mmHeight1650 mm
1401 KgWeight1380 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 Mitsubishi Dion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Dion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…