DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 Subaru Impreza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Impreza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeSubaru
XMModelImpreza
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
205 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
132 HPPower125 HP
180 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank50 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption12,1 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4350 mm
1794 mmWidth1690 mm
1394 mmHeight1420 mm
1395 KgWeight1185 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 Subaru Impreza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Impreza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…