DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 Lancia Zeta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Zeta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeLancia
XMModelZeta
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
205 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
132 HPPower136 HP
180 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption12,7 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4470 mm
1794 mmWidth1834 mm
1394 mmHeight1714 mm
1395 KgWeight1615 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 Lancia Zeta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Zeta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…