DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen Saxo vs 2004 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen SaxoSpecificationMazda 3
CitroenMakeMazda
SaxoModel3
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Citroen SaxoSpecificationMazda 3
8,7 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
205 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
118 HPPower109 HP
145 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen SaxoSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen SaxoSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen SaxoSpecificationMazda 3
3718 mmLength4420 mm
1595 mmWidth1755 mm
1368 mmHeight1465 mm
935 KgWeight1275 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen Saxo and 2004 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…