DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen Saxo vs 2004 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFord
SaxoModelC-Max
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
205 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
118 HPPower109 HP
145 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3718 mmLength4330 mm
1595 mmWidth1820 mm
1368 mmHeight1600 mm
935 KgWeight1292 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen Saxo and 2004 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…