2000 • Citroen
Saxo
Citroen Saxo 1.6 VTS (118 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Citroen Saxo vs 2000 Suzuki Baleno Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Suzuki
Baleno
Suzuki Baleno 1.6 i 16V 4WD (96 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Citroen Saxo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen SaxoSpecificationSuzuki Baleno
CitroenMakeSuzuki
SaxoModelBaleno
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Citroen SaxoSpecificationSuzuki Baleno
8,7 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
118 HPPower96 HP
145 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen SaxoSpecificationSuzuki Baleno
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank51 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen SaxoSpecificationSuzuki Baleno
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen SaxoSpecificationSuzuki Baleno
3718 mmLength4375 mm
1595 mmWidth1690 mm
1368 mmHeight1460 mm
935 KgWeight1115 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2480 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Citroen Saxo and 2000 Suzuki Baleno approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…