DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen Saxo vs 2004 Fiat Panda Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFiat
SaxoModelPanda
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
162 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement1251 cc
60 HPPower70 HP
94 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank35 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3718 mmLength3538 mm
1595 mmWidth1578 mm
1390 mmHeight1540 mm
780 KgWeight—
2385 mmWheelbase2299 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen Saxo and 2004 Fiat Panda approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…