DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Fiat Panda vs 2004 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeCitroen
PandaModelSaxo
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
155 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1251 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
70 HPPower60 HP
180 NmTorque94 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/80 R13Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3538 mmLength3718 mm
1578 mmWidth1595 mm
1540 mmHeight1390 mm
—Weight780 Kg
2299 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Fiat Panda and 2004 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…