DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen Saxo vs 2005 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeCitroen
SaxoModelC3
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h17,3 s
162 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
60 HPPower60 HP
94 NmTorque94 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3718 mmLength3850 mm
1595 mmWidth1667 mm
1390 mmHeight1529 mm
780 KgWeight978 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen Saxo and 2005 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…