DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Citroen Saxo vs 2000 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeSkoda
SaxoModelFabia
1997Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

19,1 s0–100 km/h20,0 s
149 km/hTop speed148 km/h
954 ccEngine displacement997 cc
45 HPPower50 HP
74 NmTorque84 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3718 mmLength3960 mm
1595 mmWidth1645 mm
1379 mmHeight1450 mm
805 KgWeight1040 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Citroen Saxo and 2000 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…