DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Seat Cordoba vs 1997 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

37.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeCitroen
CordobaModelSaxo
2000Model year1997
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

20,4 s0–100 km/h19,1 s
145 km/hTop speed149 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement954 cc
50 HPPower45 HP
86 NmTorque74 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4165 mmLength3718 mm
1645 mmWidth1595 mm
1420 mmHeight1379 mm
1015 KgWeight805 Kg
2445 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Seat Cordoba and 1997 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…