DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen Evasion vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Evasion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeSaab
EvasionModel9-3
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

14,1 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
175 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2088 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
109 HPPower130 HP
250 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4454 mmLength4629 mm
1812 mmWidth1711 mm
1710 mmHeight1428 mm
1615 KgWeight1295 Kg
2823 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen Evasion and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Evasion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…