DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saab 9-3 vs 2000 Citroen Evasion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Evasion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeCitroen
9-3ModelEvasion
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement2088 cc
130 HPPower109 HP
177 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4629 mmLength4454 mm
1711 mmWidth1812 mm
1428 mmHeight1710 mm
1295 KgWeight1615 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saab 9-3 and 2000 Citroen Evasion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Evasion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…