DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1987 Citroen CX vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen CX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen CXSpecificationGeo Storm
CitroenMakeGeo
CXModelStorm
1987Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Citroen CXSpecificationGeo Storm
12,4 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
175 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
102 HPPower130 HP
162 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen CXSpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank47 lt
12,0 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen CXSpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14; 185/70 R14Tyre size205/50 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen CXSpecificationGeo Storm
4650 mmLength4150 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1360 mmHeight1300 mm
1220 KgWeight1010 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1987 Citroen CX and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen CX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…