DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen C5 vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C5SpecificationSaab 9-3
CitroenMakeSaab
C5Model9-3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Citroen C5SpecificationSaab 9-3
12,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
192 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
110 HPPower130 HP
250 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C5SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C5SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C5SpecificationSaab 9-3
4618 mmLength4629 mm
1770 mmWidth1711 mm
1476 mmHeight1428 mm
1385 KgWeight1295 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen C5 and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…