DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saab 9-3 vs 2000 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationCitroen C5
SaabMakeCitroen
9-3ModelC5
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationCitroen C5
11,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
200 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
130 HPPower110 HP
177 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationCitroen C5
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationCitroen C5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationCitroen C5
4629 mmLength4618 mm
1711 mmWidth1770 mm
1428 mmHeight1476 mm
1295 KgWeight1385 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saab 9-3 and 2000 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…