DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Citroen C3 vs 2005 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V50
CitroenMakeVolvo
C3ModelV50
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V50
10,7 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
109 HPPower100 HP
147 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V50
3850 mmLength4522 mm
1667 mmWidth1845 mm
1529 mmHeight1457 mm
1060 KgWeight1335 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Citroen C3 and 2005 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…