2005 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 1.6 (100 Hp) 2005Overall Score53.5/100
2005 Volvo V50 vs 2005 Citroen C3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Citroen
C3
Citroen C3 1.6i 16V (109 Hp) 2005Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Citroen C3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
VolvoMakeCitroen
V50ModelC3
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
12,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
100 HPPower109 HP
150 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
4522 mmLength3850 mm
1845 mmWidth1667 mm
1457 mmHeight1529 mm
1335 KgWeight1060 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2460 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Volvo V50 and 2005 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…