DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Citroen C3 vs 2005 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V50
CitroenMakeVolvo
C3ModelV50
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V50
12,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
90 HPPower109 HP
215 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V50
DieselFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank52 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14; 185/60 R15; 195/50 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V50
3860 mmLength4522 mm
1667 mmWidth1845 mm
1510 mmHeight1457 mm
1088 KgWeight1416 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Citroen C3 and 2005 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…