2005 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2005Overall Score57.25/100
2005 Volvo S40 vs 2005 Citroen C3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Citroen
C3
Citroen C3 1.6 HDi (90 Hp) 2005Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C3
VolvoMakeCitroen
S40ModelC3
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C3
11,9 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14; 185/60 R15; 195/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C3
4476 mmLength3860 mm
1770 mmWidth1667 mm
1454 mmHeight1510 mm
1250 KgWeight1088 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2460 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Volvo S40 and 2005 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…