DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Citroen C2 vs 2009 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeCitroen
C2ModelC3
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
202 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
122 HPPower120 HP
143 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/45 R16Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3666 mmLength3941 mm
1659 mmWidth1728 mm
1477 mmHeight1524 mm
1084 KgWeight1075 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Citroen C2 and 2009 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…