DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Citroen C2 vs 2005 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C2SpecificationVolvo V50
CitroenMakeVolvo
C2ModelV50
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeEstate
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Citroen C2SpecificationVolvo V50
8,9 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
202 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
122 HPPower110 HP
143 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C2SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C2SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/45 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C2SpecificationVolvo V50
3666 mmLength4514 mm
1659 mmWidth1770 mm
1474 mmHeight1452 mm
1070 KgWeight1340 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Citroen C2 and 2005 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…