2005 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 1.6 D (110 Hp) 2005Overall Score60.25/100
2005 Volvo V50 vs 2005 Citroen C2 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Citroen
C2
Citroen C2 1.6i 16V (122 Hp) 2005Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V50
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C2
VolvoMakeCitroen
V50ModelC2
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C2
12,1 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
190 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
110 HPPower122 HP
240 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C2
DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank41 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/45 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C2
4514 mmLength3666 mm
1770 mmWidth1659 mm
1452 mmHeight1474 mm
1340 KgWeight1070 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2315 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Volvo V50 and 2005 Citroen C2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…