DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Citroen C-Crosser vs 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C-Crosser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeLand Rover
C-CrosserModelRange Rover Evoque
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
156 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 225/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4646 mmLength4355 mm
1806 mmWidth1965 mm
1715 mmHeight1635 mm
1790-1825 KgWeight1625 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Citroen C-Crosser and 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…