2012 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2012Overall Score70.5/100
2012 BMW X3 vs 2012 Citroen C-Crosser Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Citroen
C-Crosser
Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDi (156 Hp) 2012Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Citroen C-Crosser
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X3SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
BMWMakeCitroen
X3ModelC-Crosser
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
143 HPPower156 HP
360 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X3SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/60 R17 VTyre size215/70 R16; 225/55 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
4648 mmLength4646 mm
1881 mmWidth1806 mm
1661 mmHeight1715 mm
1660 KgWeight1790-1825 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 BMW X3 and 2012 Citroen C-Crosser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…