DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Citroen C-Crosser vs 2012 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeCitroen
C-CrosserModelC4
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
156 HPPower147 HP
380 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,9 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/70 R16; 225/55 R18Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4646 mmLength4588 mm
1806 mmWidth1773 mm
1715 mmHeight1486 mm
1790-1825 KgWeight1338 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Citroen C-Crosser and 2012 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…