DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Citroen C-Crosser vs 2008 Mazda MX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
C-CrosserModelMX-5
2008Model year2008
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5/7Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
156 HPPower167 HP
380 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 225/55 R18Tyre size"205/45 ZR17 84 W "
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4646 mmLength3995 mm
1806 mmWidth1720 mm
1715 mmHeight1245 mm
1790-1825 KgWeight1146 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Citroen C-Crosser and 2008 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…