DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Mazda MX-5 vs 2008 Citroen C-Crosser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
MX-5ModelC-Crosser
2008Model year2008
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2Seats5/7
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
167 HPPower156 HP
190 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
"205/45 ZR17 84 W "Tyre size215/70 R16; 225/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4646 mm
1720 mmWidth1806 mm
1245 mmHeight1715 mm
1146 KgWeight1790-1825 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Mazda MX-5 and 2008 Citroen C-Crosser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…