DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Citroen BX vs 1990 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeRover
BXModelMini MK
1990Model year1990
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

19,9 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
153 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
60 HPPower61 HP
110 NmTorque91 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank34 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
165/70 R14Tyre size145/70 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

4399 mmLength3050 mm
1682 mmWidth1410 mm
1410 mmHeight1350 mm
1030 KgWeight695 Kg
2655 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Citroen BX and 1990 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…