DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Rover Mini MK vs 1990 Citroen BX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeCitroen
Mini MKModelBX
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h19,9 s
148 km/hTop speed153 km/h
1275 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
61 HPPower60 HP
91 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
34 ltFuel tank66 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size165/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3050 mmLength4399 mm
1410 mmWidth1682 mm
1350 mmHeight1410 mm
695 KgWeight1030 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2655 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Rover Mini MK and 1990 Citroen BX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…