DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chrysler Sebring vs 2003 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Sebring

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeLand Rover
SebringModelRange Rover
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
216 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
203 HPPower177 HP
262 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank100 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4950 mm
1790 mmWidth1955 mm
1395 mmHeight1860 mm
1485 KgWeight2500 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chrysler Sebring and 2003 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Sebring leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…