DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chrysler Neon vs 2003 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Chrysler NeonSpecificationMG ZS
ChryslerMakeMG
NeonModelZS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Chrysler NeonSpecificationMG ZS
9,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
133 HPPower113 HP
175 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Chrysler NeonSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Chrysler NeonSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Chrysler NeonSpecificationMG ZS
4390 mmLength4520 mm
1715 mmWidth1700 mm
1421 mmHeight1390 mm
1245 KgWeight1225 Kg
2667 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chrysler Neon and 2003 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…