2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Chrysler Neon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Chrysler
Neon
Chrysler Neon 2.0 16V (133 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationChrysler Neon
RoverMakeChrysler
25ModelNeon
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationChrysler Neon
9,1 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
113 HPPower133 HP
260 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationChrysler Neon
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank47 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationChrysler Neon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationChrysler Neon
3990 mmLength4390 mm
1688 mmWidth1715 mm
1419 mmHeight1421 mm
1130 KgWeight1245 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2667 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Chrysler Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…