2003 • Chrysler
Neon
Chrysler Neon 2.0 16V (133 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
2003 Chrysler Neon vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZR
MG ZR 2.0 TDi (113 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
MG ZR
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMG ZR
ChryslerMakeMG
NeonModelZR
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMG ZR
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
133 HPPower113 HP
175 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
8 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMG ZR
4390 mmLength4011 mm
1715 mmWidth1690 mm
1421 mmHeight1400 mm
1245 KgWeight1155 Kg
2667 mmWheelbase2502 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Chrysler Neon and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…