DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chrysler Neon vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Neon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Chrysler NeonSpecificationBMW Z3
ChryslerMakeBMW
NeonModelZ3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Chrysler NeonSpecificationBMW Z3
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
200 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
133 HPPower118 HP
175 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Chrysler NeonSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank51 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption11 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Chrysler NeonSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Chrysler NeonSpecificationBMW Z3
4390 mmLength4050 mm
1715 mmWidth1740 mm
1421 mmHeight1288 mm
1245 KgWeight1220 Kg
2667 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chrysler Neon and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Neon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…