DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2003 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeChrysler
CTSModelConcorde
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
233 km/hTop speed225 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
258 HPPower258 HP
346 NmTorque348 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank65 lt
16,2 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/50 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength5310 mm
1793 mmWidth1890 mm
1440 mmHeight1435 mm
1722 KgWeight1690 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2003 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…