DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chrysler Concorde vs 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeSuzuki
ConcordeModelGrand Vitara
2002Model year2005
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3231 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
228 HPPower229 HP
305 NmTorque291 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank66 lt
15 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4500 mm
1900 mmWidth1810 mm
1420 mmHeight1695 mm
1570 KgWeight1445 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chrysler Concorde and 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…