DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2002 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeChrysler
Grand VitaraModelConcorde
2005Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement3231 cc
229 HPPower228 HP
291 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption15 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/65 R17Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength5310 mm
1810 mmWidth1900 mm
1695 mmHeight1420 mm
1445 KgWeight1570 Kg
2440 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2002 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…