DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chrysler Concorde vs 2003 Toyota Crown Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeToyota
ConcordeModelCrown
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2491 cc
203 HPPower196 HP
258 NmTorque255 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4820 mm
1900 mmWidth1765 mm
1420 mmHeight1470 mm
1570 KgWeight1590 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chrysler Concorde and 2003 Toyota Crown approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…