2002 • Skoda
Superb
Skoda Superb 2.8 (193 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
2002 Skoda Superb vs 2002 Chrysler Concorde Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Chrysler
Concorde
Chrysler Concorde 2.7 i V6 24V (203 Hp) 2002Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
Chrysler Concorde
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda SuperbSpecificationChrysler Concorde
SkodaMakeChrysler
SuperbModelConcorde
2002Model year2002
LiftbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Skoda SuperbSpecificationChrysler Concorde
8,0 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
237 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
193 HPPower203 HP
280 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda SuperbSpecificationChrysler Concorde
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank65 lt
14,3 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda SuperbSpecificationChrysler Concorde
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda SuperbSpecificationChrysler Concorde
4803 mmLength5310 mm
1765 mmWidth1900 mm
1469 mmHeight1420 mm
1250 KgWeight1570 Kg
2803 mmWheelbase2870 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Skoda Superb and 2002 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…