DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chrysler Concorde vs 2002 Citroen C8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeCitroen
ConcordeModelC8
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
187 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
203 HPPower204 HP
258 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption15,8 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4727 mm
1900 mmWidth1854 mm
1420 mmHeight1766-1856 mm
1570 KgWeight1762 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chrysler Concorde and 2002 Citroen C8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…