DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Chrysler Concorde vs 1997 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeFord
ConcordeModelTaurus
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
187 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
203 HPPower200 HP
258 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength5016 mm
1900 mmWidth1854 mm
1420 mmHeight1400 mm
1570 KgWeight1522 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Chrysler Concorde and 1997 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…