DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Opel Sintra vs 1997 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeChrysler
SintraModelConcorde
1997Model year1997
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
201 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
201 HPPower203 HP
260 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 HR 15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4670 mmLength5310 mm
1830 mmWidth1900 mm
1780 mmHeight1420 mm
1725 KgWeight1570 Kg
2865 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Opel Sintra and 1997 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…