DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Chrysler Concorde vs 1997 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeCitroen
ConcordeModelXM
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
187 km/hTop speed233 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
203 HPPower190 HP
258 NmTorque267 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption15,9 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4708 mm
1900 mmWidth1794 mm
1420 mmHeight1394 mm
1570 KgWeight1550 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Chrysler Concorde and 1997 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…