DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chrysler 300 vs 2007 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeHolden
300ModelUTE
2004Model year2007
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

6,3 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5654 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
340 HPPower340 HP
525 NmTorque470 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank0 lt
19,5 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
12,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength5052 mm
1882 mmWidth1844 mm
1483 mmHeight1476 mm
1840 KgWeight—
3048 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chrysler 300 and 2007 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…