DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden Commodore vs 2004 Chrysler 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChrysler
CommodoreModel300
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
234 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5654 cc
340 HPPower340 HP
470 NmTorque525 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank72 lt
13 ltUrban consumption19,5 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
—Average consumption12,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/45 R17Tyre size225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength4999 mm
1842 mmWidth1882 mm
1450 mmHeight1483 mm
1640 KgWeight1840 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase3048 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden Commodore and 2004 Chrysler 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…