DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Chrysler 300 vs 2012 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeFord
300ModelMustang
2010Model year2012
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h5,1 s
219 km/hTop speed220 km/h
3518 ccEngine displacement3700 cc
249 HPPower305 HP
250 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank71 lt
16,3 ltUrban consumption12 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength4781 mm
1881 mmWidth—
1481 mmHeight—
1746 KgWeight—
3048 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Chrysler 300 and 2012 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…