DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Ford Mustang vs 2010 Chrysler 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChrysler
MustangModel300
2011Model year2010
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,1 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
220 km/hTop speed219 km/h
3700 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
305 HPPower249 HP
0 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank68 lt
12 ltUrban consumption16,3 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4781 mmLength4999 mm
—Width1881 mm
—Height1481 mm
—Weight1746 Kg
—Wheelbase3048 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Ford Mustang and 2010 Chrysler 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…