DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chrysler 200 vs 2012 Toyota Crown Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Crown

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeToyota
200ModelCrown
2016Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3605 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
294 HPPower360 HP
355 NmTorque498 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank71 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
9Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength4870 mm
1871 mmWidth1795 mm
1491 mmHeight1450 mm
1650 KgWeight1680 Kg
2742 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chrysler 200 and 2012 Toyota Crown approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Crown leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…